Evolution of
Campaigns
After the 2008 election many campaign
managers started to realize the importance of social media. To that point no
election had really been influenced by the role social media had on society
during a campaign cycle. Obama was a master in utilized many things alongside
his image and speeches that characterized him as a symbol for hope and change
many people desperately wanted. The Obama 2008 campaign may be most known
amongst campaign strategists for micro-targeting and social media, often times
mixing the two. However micro-targeting is something that’ll play a bigger role
as we get closer to when people actually get out to vote. So let’s focus on
social media which plays a highly influential role in the public’s perception
of a candidate.
Free and New
Media
In past candidates have always played a balancing
game of trying to get out their message, but not have it altered along the way.
With people the relationships they have can change the tone of a campaign
message and with the media there is a scary lack of control over what will be
said about a candidate. However a new age of communicating with virtually no
cost has allowed candidates to go directly to the constituents they’ll need to
get voting in order to win a campaign. Instead of paying for postage they
simply focus on the message itself and not how it may be changed as people
alter its message. Recognizing the importance social media can play for a
candidate let’s take a look at the Buckeye state’s Governor and his social
media presence in the 2016 Republican Presidential Primary Race.
A Good Ole Boy
on The Web
I’ll focus around the two most known
social media sites Facebook and Twitter for obvious reasons as they are and for
the foreseeable future will be the biggest in the game. Facebook appears to be
geared towards a combination of promoting videos of him speaking on policy and
at events he’s hosting along the campaign trail. There isn’t much that stands
out on this page, but the hope of videos on Facebook makes a lot of sense.
People are much more willing to click on it assuming a friend posted it and
that they are sitting at computer somewhere they can watch compared to other
platforms geared to a more mobile environment.
Realizing how a platform is utilized is
essential for an effective strategy and Kasich used this along Twitter as well.
The campaign has two notable accounts with a ‘personal’ John Kasich account
that highlights his campaign stops and notable interviews and a Team Kasich campaign
communications team account. There is a difference between the two as the
communications team seems to be geared less toward image and focusing around
the storyline of the campaign – likely geared towards reporters and bloggers. The
personal page is geared much more to his image and promoting this idea of
strong and compassionate leader you’ll see along the campaign trail. The Kasich’s
campaign on Twitter as a whole appears to be focused more around encouraging
retweets and followers as it should be. Twitter is much less of a discussion
than it is for someone to scroll through as they’re waiting for the bus. Kasich
knows this and has highlighted the differences in how people approach them in
their strategies.
Predicting the
Future
All of these things are interesting, but
must be taken into context if we will be able to understand how they fit in the
picture as a whole. Be sure to check out my previous blog in order to realize
Kasich’s strengths, weaknesses, and how he’ll work with outside forces in the
future. Where do I recommend they go from here as it pertains to growing the
Kasich For America movement? A central strategy of promoting his programs is
good and utilizing broadcasted interviews and debates is great as it pertains
to getting out the message relatively easily, but they’ll need to do much more
than that. Kasich’s messages of hope and a stronger middle class will be better
communicated with clips from him on the trail. Having a dedicated team who
knows how to videotape, cut, and publicize this with the necessary equipment
should do a lot of the leg work though. Instead of putting a 30 second portion
of a debate onto a quick video with some background music get an image of
passionate leader who people can rally behind and support will follow. From
there increasing the interaction with other candidates and creating an
incentive for news journalists to cover the campaign will take Kasich For
America leaps and bounds ahead. The real question is when they’ll start
employing strategies like this as timing is always important. For more on John
Kasich and other campaign strategies candidates can employ keep checking The
Trend.
I don't think I've seen any candidates with two twitter accounts yet, so I find that interesting and I think in the long run might end up being more effective and useful for him. Do you think it might be overwhelming though for someone who might follow both? I mean, they could obviously unfollow one or even both if they find themselves annoyed, but do you think having two could have any sort of negative effect for him?
ReplyDeleteI've been following for about a month now and haven't seen too much of a deluge of posts. Additionally they appear to have different types of communication with people. The personal one appears to establishing an image of John Kasich as a compassionate, dedicated, and capable candidate, while the other appears to be more focused on notable stories or interviews he has. For context on the difference in how much they post the communications account has only posted once since the last debate, kind of shows an emphasis on which account is more established as a whole to me.
ReplyDelete